A prospective comparative study on osteosynthesis of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures with plating V/s intramedullary nailing
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fractures, while distal tibial even more complicated due to their proximity ankle and close relationship with thin,Objectives: To assess compare fractures' functional outcomes in Group A versus B. efficacy, advantages, disadvantages of treatment modalities complications. Materials Methods: This is a comparative study done from October 2018 March 2020 Department Orthopaedics, Narayana Medical College, attached general hospital, Nellore. In this period total 40 patients were taken for as per inclusion criteria. The randomized into two groups 20 cases each. treated plating, B was intramedullary nailing. Results: our study, average duration radiological union interlocking nail group 20.1 ± 1.14 weeks plating group, it 24.1 1.16 weeks. Thus, occurred significantly faster nailing group.3 had delayed union. better rom noticed compared that tibia plating. Average dorsiflexion at final follow-up 12.8 degrees 9.7 group.Conclusion: Intramedullary has advantages shortened operating time, early weight-bearing decreased wound problems an fracture, implant-related problems, overall reduced morbidity.
منابع مشابه
Intramedullary nailing and angulation prevention in distal metaphyseal tibial fractures.
Intramedullary nailing, which is preferred in tibial diaphyseal fractures, is also frequently used in distal third tibial fractures. Various angular deformities, including varus/valgus deformity, may be observed during postintramedullary nailing. Orthopedic surgeons use several methods to prevent this problem.In this study, at least 2 static locking screws were placed proximal and distal to the...
متن کاملIntramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal metaphyseal tibia and fibula.
PURPOSE To assess the results of concurrent intramedullary nailing plus plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia and fibula. METHODS 15 men and 10 women (mean age, 35 years) with concurrent fractures of the distal tibia and fibula underwent intramedullary nailing (for the tibia) and plate osteosynthesis (for the fibula). 17 fractures were type A1, 6 type A2, and 2 type A3. Compo...
متن کاملA comparative study of intramedullary interlocking nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in extra articular distal tibial fractures
BACKGROUND Extraarticular distal tibial fractures are among the most challenging fractures encountered by an orthopedician for treatment because of its subcutaneous location, poor blood supply and decreased muscular cover anteriorly, complications such as delayed union, nonunion, wound infection, and wound dehiscence are often seen as a great challenge to the surgeon. Minimally invasive plate o...
متن کاملThe Role of Biplanar Distal Locking in Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures
Background: To compare the union times of the uncomplicated tibial shaft fractures, which were distally locked by twocoronal and one sagittal screws and by only two coronal screws.Methods: 45 patients with tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nailing included in this study. 23 of 45 fractureswere treated with uniplanar two distal interlocking (Group 1) and 22 fractures were treated with bip...
متن کاملDistal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures: Does Blocking Screw Extend the Indication of Intramedullary Nailing?
Aim. To evaluate the clinical use of blocking screws as a supplement to stability in distal tibial metaphyseal fractures treated with statically locked intramedullary nail. Main Outcome Measurement. Alignment and reduction preoperatively, postoperatively, and at healing were the main outcome measured with an emphasis on maintenance of initial reduction on followup. Patients and Methods. This wa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2395-1958']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2022.v8.i3c.3193